[TODO: Add link to python script]
| msgs/s | Nº messages | relay nodes | light nodes | service nodes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 180 | 10 | 40 | 5 |
This setup was run 5 times to obtain enough data to not get biased by one result. We didn’t run the numbers mentioned in the task description because of a problem we faced with increasing the number of light nodes. This is explained below.
Results will be averaged when doing the final comparison with nWaku, making the comparison with only a single box plot easier to analyze.
The average times from light nodes to start receiving messages after login on each experiment are:
| Experiment 1 | 21.575 seconds |
|---|---|
| Experiment 2 | 20.9 seconds |
| Experiment 3 | 20.35 seconds |
| Experiment 4 | 18.3 seconds |
| Experiment 5 | 23.95 seconds |
This is the information that can be also seen in the following figure:
<aside> 💡
When increasing the number of light nodes, we discovered an increasing time in receiving messages after login:
| Nº Light nodes | delay |
|---|---|
| 40 | 20.9 seconds |
| 40 | 19.1 seconds |
| 50 | 26.34 seconds |
| 60 | 38.6 seconds |
| 70 | 33 seconds |
| 80 | 50 seconds |
| </aside> |
Time to readiness to receive live messages in 5 repeated scenarios.
Comparison of received bandwidth from the entire container on 5 different experiments, relay vs light.
Comparison of sent bandwidth from the entire container on 5 different experiments, relay vs light.
Comparison of RAM usage from the entire container on 5 different experiments, relay vs light.