🎨 Design Team
- Multiple platform directions are not helpful
- Features across platforms should be considered and worked on as close to simultaneously as possible
- Reduces efficiency of work to drop and re-pick up context with months apart
- Having multiple CCs involved from an early stage has positive impact for marketing so that comms can be clearer
- 3 Amigos may need to be flexible on the "3" part
📄 Docs Team
- Concern about starting with a feature with a figma file
- It is uncertain what is implemented and what is not
- Developers write on github, doc team have to hunt down the epics or issues
- Also it is uncertain what will be included in what release
- Is there shared workspace for all of the activity that the CCs work on
- Consider Crews workspace template
- Formalise the process of share a screenshot of the feature in the documentation, and release articles
- Changes to features need to be documented somewhere
- Record somehow that a change decision was made.
- Explore automation process to highlight when feature changes are made
- When writing an article about a new feature identify who the developers are
- Automate alerting teams when certain stages of a feature lifecycle have been met.
- Possibly link into label inclusion for same with QA
🖥️🔍 Desktop QA
- The development process doesn't include user stories during a particular point
- Issues lack an entry point in the development lifecycle
- We should have some kind of business ownership of building processes
- Revenue needs to have specific goals from a particular role
- We should have processes that allow us to compete with small startup team in the web3 space.